Roger The Dog

Joined : 30 Jun 2008 Posts : 30 Location : Kilcoy, QLD
| Subject: Re: T. pach or sub species? Sun Jul 06, 2008 4:55 pm | |
| Hey San Rainbow. Would it be impolite to ask how much a big beast like that cost you? |
|
trigonus Admin

  Age : 28 Joined : 23 Jan 2008 Posts : 611 Location : coastal NSW 1°C - 40°C
| Subject: Re: T. pach or sub species? Sun Jul 06, 2008 5:09 pm | |
| Looks a bit different from Super Pedro to my eyes, but I can see where prier is coming from as it has a distinct scop look about it. I think Sup Ped has pretty much been lumped into the T. scopulicola/T. cordobensis group at this stage. I am pretty happy to admit that it is a T. cordobensis (Sup Ped) or a variation or hybrid thereof. Still think it's a hybrid, though good old Backeberg clone does get quite fat when ground grown and well fed. Where's PD? He will probably have a good idea of what it could be. _________________ mmm spikey... |
|
San Rainbow

Joined : 21 Apr 2008 Posts : 181 Location : south of the border
| Subject: Re: T. pach or sub species? Sun Jul 06, 2008 6:49 pm | |
| | Roger The Dog wrote: | | Would it be impolite to ask how much a big beast like that cost you? |
No not at all, I picked it up for $60 from a local nursery, bargain ah . They didn't seem to have any others just your standard T. Pach, I was pretty lucky...
| trigonus wrote: | | Where's PD? He will probably have a good idea of what it could be. |
yea I was hoping he would have a nudge. |
|
PD Moderator

  Age : 31 Joined : 02 Apr 2008 Posts : 181 Location : Vic.
| Subject: Re: T. pach or sub species? Mon Jul 07, 2008 4:11 pm | |
| Its "super pedro". Grows much much fatter than regular T pach, has very different spination. |
|
San Rainbow

Joined : 21 Apr 2008 Posts : 181 Location : south of the border
| Subject: Re: T. pach or sub species? Mon Jul 07, 2008 5:20 pm | |
| cheers all  |
|