|
Goto page : 1, 2  |
| Author | Message |
|---|
San Rainbow

Joined : 21 Apr 2008 Posts : 181 Location : south of the border
| Subject: T. pach or sub species? Sat Jul 05, 2008 9:22 am | |
| Got this huge fat T. pach recently, well at lest I think it is, the spines are slightly bigger than normal pach spines @ (biggest) 5mm, but I suppose they are relevant to the size of the plant. The photos are taken at an angle where the plant is looking its skinniest, its about 17cm to 18cm at the base and yes it needs a much bigger pot, bring on spring
 
Last edited by trigonus on Sat Jul 05, 2008 6:30 pm; edited 3 times in total (Reason for editing : pics too big) |
|
 | |
San Rainbow

Joined : 21 Apr 2008 Posts : 181 Location : south of the border
| Subject: Re: T. pach or sub species? Sat Jul 05, 2008 9:24 am | |
| sorry for huge pics  |
|
 | |
watertrade

Joined : 16 May 2008 Posts : 128 Location : Canberra
| Subject: Re: T. pach or sub species? Sat Jul 05, 2008 9:55 am | |
| | San Rainbow wrote: | sorry for huge pics  |
huge plant = huge pics! very nice  |
|
 | |
lewis

Joined : 07 May 2008 Posts : 341 Location : Melbourne
| Subject: Re: T. pach or sub species? Sat Jul 05, 2008 10:56 am | |
| no idea on trichos but nice Epithelanthas  |
|
 | |
San Rainbow

Joined : 21 Apr 2008 Posts : 181 Location : south of the border
| Subject: Re: T. pach or sub species? Sat Jul 05, 2008 11:54 am | |
| | lewis wrote: | no idea on trichos but nice Epithelanthas 
|
cheers, they are one of my faves! pm me if you ever want to let any go  |
|
 | |
trigonus Admin

  Age : 28 Joined : 23 Jan 2008 Posts : 592 Location : coastal NSW 1°C - 40°C
| Subject: Re: T. pach or sub species? Sat Jul 05, 2008 12:28 pm | |
| Kinda looks like a scop. But looks alot like the Backeberg clone of San Pedro too. Possibly a hybrid.
Looks like it's about 6-7 inch in diameter so am going to have to say scop if it's that fat. _________________ mmm spikey... |
|
 | |
bob-bob
Joined : 17 Mar 2008 Posts : 12 Location : Sydney
| |
 | |
parrotsheaven

Joined : 14 May 2008 Posts : 396 Location : Red Cliffs, Victoria
| |
 | |
San Rainbow

Joined : 21 Apr 2008 Posts : 181 Location : south of the border
| Subject: Re: T. pach or sub species? Sat Jul 05, 2008 6:21 pm | |
| | bob-bob wrote: | http://www.flickr.com/photos/msscacti/819777099/
Here is a photo comparing the short spined T. scopulicola and T. cordobensis. Take a look and see what ya think.
|
yea kinda looks more like T. cordobensis...
cheers bob bob  |
|
 | |
calycium Moderator

Joined : 06 Apr 2008 Posts : 354 Location : oz
| Subject: Re: T. pach or sub species? Sat Jul 05, 2008 6:21 pm | |
| | Nice looking plants including the copiapoas |
|
 | |
San Rainbow

Joined : 21 Apr 2008 Posts : 181 Location : south of the border
| Subject: Re: T. pach or sub species? Sat Jul 05, 2008 6:32 pm | |
| now it looks like a normal pach trig

cheers cal 
Last edited by San Rainbow on Sat Jul 05, 2008 6:35 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
 | |
trigonus Admin

  Age : 28 Joined : 23 Jan 2008 Posts : 592 Location : coastal NSW 1°C - 40°C
| Subject: Re: T. pach or sub species? Sat Jul 05, 2008 6:32 pm | |
| Sorry San, I had to edit the size of your pics, was really really annoying me. Hope you don't mind. People you can resize your pics in the editor, it's really easy and it prevents me from getting annoyed about large pics too  _________________ mmm spikey... |
|
 | |
San Rainbow

Joined : 21 Apr 2008 Posts : 181 Location : south of the border
| Subject: Re: T. pach or sub species? Sat Jul 05, 2008 7:27 pm | |
| | trigonus wrote: | Sorry San, I had to edit the size of your pics, was really really annoying me. Hope you don't mind. |
no probs mate, it was annoying me to!
 |
|
 | |
prier

Joined : 04 Apr 2008 Posts : 33 Location : melbourne
| Subject: Re: T. pach or sub species? Sat Jul 05, 2008 7:30 pm | |
| Looks to me to be the standard Backeberg clone of E. Pachanoi. It can be slightly varied, it was probably a cutting off an older plant. When you repot it check to see whether it was seed grown, but I highly doubt it.
If you really think it is something else my guess would be E. sp. 'Super Pedro', that's pretty similar to E. pachanoi but slightly fatter. |
|
 | |
San Rainbow

Joined : 21 Apr 2008 Posts : 181 Location : south of the border
| Subject: Re: T. pach or sub species? Sat Jul 05, 2008 7:37 pm | |
| cheers prier, have been looking @ pics on the net but there is to much variance for me to ID.
cheers |
|
 | |
|