Roger The Dog

Number of posts: 72 Location: Geebung Registration date: 2008-06-30
 | Subject: Re: T. pach or sub species? Sun Jul 06, 2008 5:55 pm | |
| Hey San Rainbow. Would it be impolite to ask how much a big beast like that cost you? |
|
trigonus Admin & Cactus Fiend

Number of posts: 881 Location: coastal NSW 1°C - 40°C Registration date: 2008-01-23
 | Subject: Re: T. pach or sub species? Sun Jul 06, 2008 6:09 pm | |
| Looks a bit different from Super Pedro to my eyes, but I can see where prier is coming from as it has a distinct scop look about it. I think Sup Ped has pretty much been lumped into the T. scopulicola/T. cordobensis group at this stage. I am pretty happy to admit that it is a T. cordobensis (Sup Ped) or a variation or hybrid thereof. Still think it's a hybrid, though good old Backeberg clone does get quite fat when ground grown and well fed. Where's PD? He will probably have a good idea of what it could be. _________________ コレクタ
|
|
San Rainbow Calm and Collected

Number of posts: 172 Location: south of the border Registration date: 2008-04-21
 | Subject: Re: T. pach or sub species? Sun Jul 06, 2008 7:49 pm | |
| | Roger The Dog wrote: | | Would it be impolite to ask how much a big beast like that cost you? |
No not at all, I picked it up for $60 from a local nursery, bargain ah . They didn't seem to have any others just your standard T. Pach, I was pretty lucky...
| trigonus wrote: | | Where's PD? He will probably have a good idea of what it could be. |
yea I was hoping he would have a nudge. |
|
PD Calm and Collected

Number of posts: 203 Location: Vic. Registration date: 2008-04-02
 | Subject: Re: T. pach or sub species? Mon Jul 07, 2008 5:11 pm | |
| Its "super pedro". Grows much much fatter than regular T pach, has very different spination. |
|
San Rainbow Calm and Collected

Number of posts: 172 Location: south of the border Registration date: 2008-04-21
 | Subject: Re: T. pach or sub species? Mon Jul 07, 2008 6:20 pm | |
| cheers all  |
|